VGS vs VTS vs IVV: Australian International ETF Comparison 2026
- Anita Arnold
- Jan 8
- 12 min read
Which ETF is Best: VGS, VTS, or IVV?
Choosing between VGS, VTS, and IVV is one of the most common questions Australian investors face when building international exposure. All three are low-cost, ASX-listed ETFs providing access to developed markets—but they do so in meaningfully different ways.

The short answer: There's no single "best" ETF. The right choice depends on whether investors want global diversification (VGS), complete US market coverage (VTS), or specific S&P 500 exposure (IVV).
The key insight most investors miss: VGS is marketed as "international" but 73.6% is still US stocks. The real question becomes: 73.6% US or 100% US?
Quick Comparison: VGS vs VTS vs IVV
Feature | VGS | VTS | IVV |
Full Name | Vanguard MSCI Index International Shares ETF | Vanguard U.S. Total Market Shares Index ETF | iShares S&P 500 ETF |
Provider | Vanguard | Vanguard | BlackRock (iShares) |
Management Fee | 0.18% p.a. | 0.03% p.a. | 0.04% p.a. |
Holdings | 1,284 stocks | 3,529 stocks | 500 stocks |
Geographic Focus | 22 developed countries | United States only | United States only |
US Exposure | 73.6% | 100% | 100% |
Dividend Yield | 1.5% | 1.1% | 0.99% |
Currency | Unhedged AUD | Unhedged AUD | Unhedged AUD |
Fund Size (AUD) | $14.05B | $6.43B | $13.11B |
Distribution | Quarterly | Quarterly | Quarterly |
Data from official fund fact sheets, November/December 2025
What is VGS? (Vanguard International Shares ETF)
Overview
VGS tracks the MSCI World ex-Australia Index, holding approximately 1,284 stocks across 22 developed countries. Despite its "international" branding, 73.6% of holdings are US companies.
What's Inside VGS?
Geographic Breakdown:
United States: 73.6%
Japan: 5.6%
Canada: 3.4%
United Kingdom: 3.3%
France: 2.4%
Germany: 2.4%
Switzerland: 2.3%
Other: ~10%
Top 10 Holdings: NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet (Google), Amazon, Meta, Tesla, Eli Lilly, JPMorgan Chase, plus other global leaders.
VGS Key Features
Management Fee: 0.18% per annum
Dividend Yield: 1.5% (paid quarterly)
Fund Size: $14.05 billion AUD
Currency: Unhedged to Australian dollar
Who Considers VGS?
Investors seeking the broadest developed market exposure in a single ETF typically consider VGS. It provides access to 22 countries' stock markets, though the US still dominates due to market capitalisation weighting.
What is VTS? (Vanguard US Total Market ETF)
Overview
VTS tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index—essentially the entire investable US stock market. With 3,529 holdings, VTS captures large, mid, small, and micro-cap companies.
What's Inside VTS?
Market Cap Breakdown:
Large-cap: ~70-75%
Mid-cap: ~15-20%
Small-cap: ~10-15%
Micro-cap: ~1-5%
Top 10 Holdings: NVIDIA, Microsoft, Apple, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Broadcom, Tesla, Berkshire Hathaway, JPMorgan Chase.
VTS Key Features
Management Fee: 0.03% per annum (lowest of the three)
Dividend Yield: 1.1% (paid quarterly)
Fund Size: $6.43 billion AUD
Currency: Unhedged to Australian dollar
Why is VTS So Cheap?
VTS has the lowest fee (0.03%) for three reasons:
Scale: The underlying US fund has over $3 trillion in assets globally
Simplicity: Tracking one market requires less complex management
Vanguard Structure: Vanguard is owned by its funds, passing cost savings to investors
Who Considers VTS?
Investors wanting complete US market exposure at the absolute lowest cost typically consider VTS. It includes everything from mega-cap tech companies down to small emerging businesses.
What is IVV? (iShares S&P 500 ETF)
Overview
IVV tracks the S&P 500 Index—the 500 largest US companies by market capitalisation. It represents approximately 88% of the US stock market's total value, focusing exclusively on large-cap, established businesses.
What's Inside IVV?
Market Focus:
Large-cap and mega-cap companies only
Established, profitable businesses
The "blue chip" segment of the US market
Top 10 Holdings: NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Broadcom, Alphabet (Class A & C), Meta, Tesla, Berkshire Hathaway.
IVV Key Features
Management Fee: 0.04% per annum
Dividend Yield: 0.99% (paid quarterly)
Fund Size: $13.11 billion AUD (largest of the three)
Currency: Unhedged to Australian dollar
Who Considers IVV?
Investors specifically wanting S&P 500 exposure—the most widely tracked equity index globally—typically consider IVV. It focuses on established large-cap leaders rather than including smaller, emerging companies.
VGS vs IVV: Which Should I Choose?
The Core Difference
VGS = 73.6% US + 26.4% other developed markets (Japan, Canada, UK, Europe) IVV = 100% US large-cap (S&P 500 companies only)
Key Considerations
Choose VGS when:
Seeking geographic diversification beyond just the US
Wanting exposure to Japanese, Canadian, UK, and European markets
Comfortable with the 0.18% management fee for broader coverage
Preferring "set and forget" global diversification in one holding
Choose IVV when:
Specifically wanting S&P 500 exposure
Preferring established mega-cap US companies
Seeking lower fees (0.04% vs 0.18%)
Building a portfolio with separate allocations to different regions
Can I Hold Both VGS and IVV?
Yes, but understand the overlap. Since VGS is 73.6% US stocks, holding both VGS and IVV creates significant US duplication. Investors holding both are essentially overweighting US exposure while paying for VGS's international component twice (once through VGS, once through the overlap).
Alternative approaches:
VGS alone for global exposure
IVV + separate European/Asian ETFs for more control over regional allocations
VTS instead of IVV for broader US coverage
VTS vs IVV: What's the Difference?
Size and Scope
VTS = 3,529 stocks (entire US market: large, mid, small, micro-cap) IVV = 500 stocks (large-cap only: S&P 500 companies)
Practical Differences
1. Market Cap Coverage
VTS includes companies IVV doesn't:
Mid-cap growth companies (5-10% of VTS)
Small-cap emerging businesses (10-15% of VTS)
Micro-cap early-stage companies (~2-3% of VTS)
IVV focuses exclusively on the 500 largest, most established companies.
2. Fee Difference
VTS: 0.03% per annum IVV: 0.04% per annum
The difference is minimal (0.01%) but over decades, VTS's lower cost adds up slightly.
3. Top Holdings Overlap
Both share the same top 10-15 holdings (NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, etc.) because IVV's large-caps also dominate VTS by market cap weighting. The key difference is VTS's "tail" of 3,029 additional smaller companies.
Which One: VTS or IVV?
VTS provides:
Lower fee (0.03%)
Broader diversification (entire US market)
Exposure to emerging mid/small-cap companies
Slightly higher volatility (small-caps can be more volatile)
IVV provides:
S&P 500 brand recognition (most widely tracked index)
Focus on proven, established businesses
Marginally lower volatility (large-caps only)
Specific benchmark for comparing performance
For most long-term investors, VTS's lower fee and broader coverage make it the more efficient choice. IVV suits those specifically wanting S&P 500 exposure or preferring established large-caps exclusively.
VGS vs VTS: Global or US-Only?
The Core Question
VGS = 73.6% US + 26.4% international developed markets VTS = 100% US complete market coverage
The 26.4% Difference
VGS's non-US allocation includes:
Japan: 5.6%
Canada: 3.4%
UK: 3.3%
France: 2.4%
Germany: 2.4%
Switzerland: 2.3%
Other: ~9%
Is this 26.4% worth the higher fee?
VGS charges 0.18% vs VTS's 0.03%—a difference of 0.15% annually. Over time, this compounds.
Arguments for VGS:
Geographic diversification reduces single-country risk
Exposure to non-US sectors (Japanese manufacturing, European luxury, Canadian resources)
Market-cap weighted global approach (reflects actual market sizes)
Arguments for VTS:
Lower fee means more capital working for investors
US companies already derive significant revenue internationally
Simpler portfolio construction (add separate regional ETFs if desired)
The Fee Impact
While VGS's 0.18% fee is still low compared to active funds, the 0.15% difference from VTS compounds over decades. Investors should weigh this cost against the value of VGS's 26.4% non-US allocation based on their own diversification preferences.
Is VGS Too US-Heavy?
Understanding the 73.6% US Weight
VGS's heavy US allocation isn't bias—it's market reality. The United States represents approximately 70% of developed market capitalisation globally. VGS uses market-cap weighting, so the 73.6% US allocation simply reflects how large US markets are relative to other developed countries.
Different Perspectives
"The US allocation is appropriate":
Market-cap weighting reflects economic reality
US companies dominate global markets (tech, finance, healthcare)
Fighting market weights often underperforms over time
"The US allocation is too high":
Single-country concentration risk
Prefer equal-weighted or tilted allocations
Believe other regions offer better future opportunities
What Can Investors Do?
If comfortable with 73.6% US: VGS works well as a single global holding.
If wanting less US exposure:
Combine VGS with emerging markets ETFs (shifts allocation)
Use specific regional ETFs (Europe, Asia) alongside smaller US allocation
Consider equal-weighted or strategic allocation approaches
If wanting more US exposure: VTS or IVV provide 100% US coverage.
VGS vs VTS vs IVV: Which Has the Highest Return?
The Performance Question
This article does not compare historical returns because past performance does not indicate future results. All three ETFs track developed equity markets that have historically grown over time, but future returns are unpredictable.
What Drives Returns?
For VGS: Returns depend on global developed market performance, with 73.6% driven by US markets and 26.4% by other developed countries.
For VTS: Returns track the entire US stock market across all capitalisations.
For IVV: Returns track the S&P 500 large-cap index specifically.
Factors Beyond the ETF Itself
Returns for Australian investors also depend on:
Currency movements (AUD/USD exchange rate fluctuations)
Market conditions (bull vs bear markets)
Economic cycles (interest rates, growth, inflation)
Time horizon (short-term volatility vs long-term growth)
The Right Question
Instead of "which has the highest return," investors should ask:
Which allocation suits my portfolio strategy?
Which geographic exposure do I want?
Which fee am I comfortable paying for that exposure?
VGS vs VTS vs IVV: Dividend Yield Comparison
Current Dividend Yields
VGS: 1.5% dividend yield
VTS: 1.1% dividend yield
IVV: 0.99% dividend yield
Why the Differences?
VGS's higher yield (1.5%):
Includes international companies with traditionally higher dividend policies (European, UK, Australian companies)
Non-US markets often have more mature, dividend-focused businesses
VTS's mid-range yield (1.1%):
Includes mid and small-cap companies that reinvest profits for growth
Balances dividend-payers with growth-focused businesses
IVV's lower yield (0.99%):
S&P 500 large-caps increasingly favour share buybacks over dividends
Tech-heavy composition (companies like Alphabet, Meta reinvest rather than pay dividends)
Important Context
Dividend yield should not be the primary selection criterion. Total return (capital growth + dividends) matters more than yield alone. Lower-yielding ETFs may deliver stronger capital appreciation, resulting in better total returns over time.
Additionally, distributions from these ETFs are subject to Australian tax and US dividend withholding tax (typically 15%).
Currency Risk: How AUD/USD Affects Returns
All Three Are Unhedged
VGS, VTS, and IVV are all unhedged to the Australian dollar. This means currency movements directly impact returns for Australian investors.
How Currency Risk Works
Scenario 1: AUD weakens (USD strengthens)
US stocks return +10% (in USD)
AUD/USD falls from $0.65 to $0.55 (AUD weakens ~15%)
Australian investor return: approximately +25% (stock gain + currency gain)
Scenario 2: AUD strengthens (USD weakens)
US stocks return +10% (in USD)
AUD/USD rises from $0.65 to $0.75 (AUD strengthens ~15%)
Australian investor return: approximately -5% (stock gain - currency loss)
These are hypothetical illustrations only. Actual currency movements vary and cannot be predicted.
Currency-Hedged Alternatives
For investors wanting to remove currency risk:
VGAD: Currency-hedged version of VGS
IHVV: Currency-hedged version of IVV
No hedged VTS equivalent currently available on ASX
Currency hedging adds cost (typically 0.10-0.15% extra in fees) and introduces different considerations. Choosing between hedged and unhedged involves evaluating currency views, time horizon, and risk tolerance—topics beyond this comparison's scope.
Can I Hold VGS, VTS, and IVV Together?
Understanding the Overlap
Holding all three creates significant duplication:
VGS contains:
73.6% US stocks (overlaps with VTS and IVV)
26.4% non-US developed markets (unique)
VTS contains:
All S&P 500 companies (complete overlap with IVV)
Plus 3,029 additional US mid/small/micro-cap companies
IVV contains:
500 large-cap US companies (all included in VTS)
The Result
Holding all three would:
Overweight US exposure significantly (paying fees multiple times for same stocks)
Dilute VGS's international diversification
Create inefficient portfolio construction
Better Approaches
For global + US exposure:
VGS alone (simple, one-fund solution)
VGS + VAS (international + Australian)
For US-focused + international:
VTS + separate European/Asian ETFs
IVV + separate regional exposures
For complete diversification:
VTS (or IVV) + VEU (ex-US international)
VGS + VAS (international + Australian, no US duplication)
Tax Implications for Australian Investors
Australian Tax Treatment
All three ETFs generate taxable income for Australian residents:
1. Distribution Income Quarterly distributions are taxable income in the year received. These distributions include:
Dividends from underlying stocks
Capital gains from portfolio rebalancing
Foreign income
2. Capital Gains Tax Selling ETF units triggers capital gains tax (CGT) on any profit. The CGT discount (50%) applies after holding for 12+ months.
US Dividend Withholding Tax
All three ETFs hold US stocks, which are subject to US dividend withholding tax:
Standard rate: 15% withheld on US dividends (under Australia-US tax treaty)
What this means: Australian investors receive 85% of US dividends; 15% is withheld by the IRS
Tax offset: Foreign income tax offsets may be available, depending on individual tax circumstances
VGS-Specific Consideration
VGS holds stocks from 22 countries, each with different withholding tax rates:
US dividends: 15% withheld
Japanese dividends: 15% withheld
UK dividends: 0% withheld (no withholding for Australian residents)
European dividends: Varies by country (0-35%)
Tax Advice Disclaimer
Tax treatment varies based on individual circumstances. Investors should consult a qualified tax adviser for advice specific to their situation. This information is general only and is not tax advice.
What Are the Best ASX ETFs for Long-Term Investment?
VGS, VTS, and IVV in Context
All three are among the most popular ASX ETFs for long-term investing, but "best" depends on investment strategy:
For global diversification:
VGS (international developed markets)
VTS or IVV (US markets)
VAS or A200 (Australian market)
VAF or VGB (bonds for diversification)
For US-focused portfolios:
VTS (complete US market, lowest fee)
IVV (S&P 500 specifically)
NDQ (NASDAQ 100 for tech concentration)
For international without US dominance:
VEU (ex-US developed and emerging markets)
VAE (Asian markets)
VEQ (European markets)
Key Principles for Long-Term Investing
Regardless of which ETFs are chosen:
Diversification: Don't concentrate in single regions/sectors
Fees matter: Lower fees compound positively over decades
Consistency: Regular investing beats timing the market
Time horizon: Longer horizons smooth short-term volatility
All three ETFs (VGS, VTS, IVV) are high-quality, low-cost options suitable for long-term portfolios. The choice depends on desired geographic allocation and portfolio construction approach.
Should I Buy VGS or VTS for Australian Investors?
The Decision Framework
Choose VGS when:
Wanting global developed market exposure in one ETF
Comfortable with 73.6% US + 26.4% international allocation
Preferring market-cap weighted global approach
Willing to pay 0.18% fee for geographic diversification
Seeking "set and forget" simplicity
Choose VTS when:
Comfortable with 100% US market exposure
Planning to add separate international ETFs later
Prioritising lowest possible fees (0.03%)
Wanting complete US market coverage (including mid/small-cap)
Building custom portfolio with specific regional allocations
Consider both when:
VTS for core US exposure (low cost, broad coverage)
VGS for international diversification (adds non-US developed markets)
Combined allocation provides custom global exposure
Common Portfolio Approaches
Approach 1: Simple (2 ETFs)
50% VGS (global developed)
50% VAS (Australian)
Result: Global diversification, home bias, simple maintenance
Approach 2: US-Focused (3 ETFs)
40% VTS (US total market)
30% VEU (ex-US international)
30% VAS (Australian)
Result: More control over regional allocations, low fees
Approach 3: Minimal (1 ETF)
100% VGS (if no Australian exposure desired)
Result: Maximum simplicity, global coverage, slightly higher fee
VGS or IVV or Both?
The Overlap Problem
Holding both VGS and IVV creates substantial overlap:
VGS is 73.6% US stocks
IVV is 100% US large-cap stocks
Many of IVV's holdings appear in VGS's US allocation
When Holding Both Makes Sense
Scenario 1: Transitioning portfolios Gradually shifting from IVV (pure US) to VGS (global) by holding both temporarily during reallocation.
Scenario 2: Overweighting US intentionally
VGS provides 73.6% US + 26.4% international
IVV adds extra US large-cap concentration
Result: Higher US exposure than VGS alone (suitable if preferring US overweight)
When Holding Both Doesn't Make Sense
Scenario 1: Seeking diversification If the goal is geographic diversification, holding both VGS and IVV dilutes VGS's international component by doubling up on US stocks.
Scenario 2: Fee efficiency Paying fees twice for overlapping holdings (VGS's US allocation + IVV) is inefficient.
Better Alternatives
Instead of VGS + IVV:
VGS alone (if wanting global diversification)
IVV + VEU (if wanting to control US vs ex-US allocation)
VTS alone (if wanting low-cost complete US coverage, then add international later)
Which ETF Gives the Highest Return?
Why This Question Has No Answer
Past performance does not indicate future results. Any historical comparison would be misleading because:
Markets change constantly
Currency movements vary
Time periods affect comparisons
Future returns are unpredictable
What Influences Returns?
For all three ETFs:
Underlying market performance (US, global developed markets)
Currency movements (AUD/USD exchange rate)
Market cycles (bull vs bear markets)
Economic conditions (interest rates, inflation, growth)
Time horizon (short-term volatility vs long-term trends)
The Right Focus
Instead of "highest return," investors should focus on:
Appropriate allocation: Does this match investment strategy?
Diversification: Does this provide desired geographic exposure?
Fees: Lower fees compound positively over time
Risk tolerance: Can volatility be handled without panic selling?
All three ETFs provide exposure to developed equity markets that have historically grown over long periods. Future returns will depend on factors beyond the ETFs themselves.
Important Considerations Before Investing
1. Portfolio Context Matters
These ETFs should fit within an overall portfolio strategy:
Existing Australian equity exposure (VAS, A200, etc.)
Target allocation between international and domestic stocks
Need for bonds, property, or other asset classes
Overall diversification across regions and sectors
2. Risk Factors Apply to All Three
Investing in equities involves risk:
Market risk: Stock prices can decline
Currency risk: AUD/USD fluctuations affect returns
Concentration risk: Top holdings dominate all three ETFs
Economic risk: US economic downturns impact all three
Volatility: Short-term price swings are normal
3. Time Horizon Matters
These ETFs suit long-term investors (5+ years minimum):
Short-term volatility is normal
Longer horizons smooth out market fluctuations
Equity markets have historically grown over long periods
Past trends do not guarantee future results
4. Fee Considerations
While all three have low fees compared to active funds, the differences matter over decades:
VTS: 0.03% (lowest)
IVV: 0.04% (very low)
VGS: 0.18% (low, but 0.15% higher than VTS)
Lower fees mean more capital compounds for investors over time.
Where to Find More Information
Official ETF Resources
VGS (Vanguard):
Website: vanguard.com.au
Product Code: 8212
Download PDS and fact sheets
VTS (Vanguard):
Website: vanguard.com.au
Product Code: 0970
Download PDS and fact sheets
IVV (BlackRock):
Website: blackrock.com/au
Product Code: 275304
Download PDS and fact sheets
Before Investing
Investors should:
Read the Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) for each ETF
Review the Target Market Determination (TMD)
Consider investment objectives, financial situation, and needs
Assess whether this information is appropriate for their circumstances
Seek professional financial advice if needed
Summary: VGS vs VTS vs IVV
Key Differences
VGS (Vanguard International Shares):
1,284 holdings across 22 developed countries
73.6% US + 26.4% international
0.18% management fee
Broadest geographic diversification
VTS (Vanguard US Total Market):
3,529 holdings covering entire US market
100% US (large, mid, small, micro-cap)
0.03% management fee (lowest)
Most comprehensive US coverage
IVV (iShares S&P 500):
500 holdings (S&P 500 large-caps)
100% US (established leaders only)
0.04% management fee
Specific S&P 500 benchmark
The Bottom Line
There is no universally "best" ETF. The appropriate choice depends on:
Desired geographic exposure (global vs US-only)
Fee sensitivity (VTS lowest, VGS highest)
Diversification preferences (broad vs concentrated)
Portfolio construction approach (single fund vs building blocks)
Individual investment strategy and goals
All three are high-quality, low-cost options for long-term investing. Investors should choose based on their specific strategy and circumstances, not on promises of future returns.
Disclaimer
Finer Market Points Pty Ltd, CAR 1304002, AFSL 526688, ABN 87 645 284 680. This general information is educational only and not financial advice, recommendation, forecast or solicitation. Consider your objectives, financial situation and needs before acting. Seek appropriate professional advice. We accept no liability for any loss or damages arising from use. Data Sources: Vanguard Australia and BlackRock Australia official fund fact sheets (November/December 2025)
Article Last Updated: January 2026 | Word Count: ~5,850 | Purpose: Educational comparison for Australian investors

Comments