How to Identify ASX Momentum Leaders: Why Beach Energy Failed While Paladin Rallied 40%
- Christopher Hall
- 2 hours ago
- 16 min read
Written by Christopher Hall, AdvDipFP | Authorised Representative, AFSL 526688 | January 2026 The difference between trading ASX momentum leaders and laggards determines whether traders capture 40% advances or endure 15% declines. During periods when market conditions deteriorate, this performance gap widens dramatically. The challenge facing momentum traders: learning to identify which stocks qualify as genuine leaders and which represent laggards destined to underperform their sectors.
Gary Glover (Novice Capital) provides educational analysis of leader versus laggard characteristics through systematic pattern recognition. His methodology focuses on swing structure, volume behaviour, and moving average relationships—observable chart characteristics that differentiate stocks likely to advance from those likely to stagnate or decline.
This article examines six systematic lessons for identifying ASX momentum leaders, drawing from real market examples including Beach Energy's failure, Paladin Energy's advance, and the emergence of insurance sector leadership. The educational framework covers pattern recognition, position management, and common mistakes traders make when attempting to trade laggards instead of leaders.
Lesson 1: Why Laggards Fail—The Beach Energy Case Study
Beach Energy (BPT) demonstrated classic laggard behaviour during a period when the broader energy sector showed strength. While sector peers Karoon Energy (KAR) and Yancoal (YAL) established higher swing lows during pullbacks, Beach Energy made progressively lower swing lows—a pattern that preceded significant underperformance.
Gary Glover's analysis reveals the critical distinction: "This was showing laggard tendencies from the very start. While all the other names were setting up pretty strong and making higher lows, this was making lower lows."
Chart Characteristics of BPT's Laggard Behaviour:
Swing Structure:Beach Energy failed to establish the higher low pattern characteristic of accumulation. During periods when energy sector momentum remained positive, BPT created lower lows on each successive pullback. This swing structure indicates distribution rather than accumulation—existing shareholders exiting positions rather than new buyers establishing support levels. These characteristics contrast sharply with the three-stage VCP identification methodology used to identify genuine accumulation patterns.
Volume Patterns:Laggards typically show heavier volume on declining days compared to advancing days. Beach Energy demonstrated this distribution signature, with volume expanding during price declines rather than contracting—the opposite pattern observed in genuine leaders.
Moving Average Relationships:BPT traded below the 50-day moving average during the observation period, using the average as resistance rather than support. Leaders tend to hold the 50-day moving average as a floor during corrections, while laggards struggle to break above this level even during sector rallies.
The Uranium Sector Comparison: BOE vs PDN/DYL/BMN
The uranium sector provided clear demonstration of leader versus laggard performance during the same market period. Boss Energy (BOE) exhibited similar laggard characteristics to Beach Energy, while Paladin Energy (PDN), Deep Yellow (DYL), and Bannerman Energy (BMN) demonstrated leadership patterns.
Glover's educational observation: "Look at the leader, look at the strongest—Paladin, Deep Yellow, and Bannerman—they were the stronger names. So they've all gone up here while the laggard hasn't struggled."
Performance Outcome:The three uranium leaders (PDN, DYL, BMN) advanced while Boss Energy stagnated. This performance divergence occurred within the same sector during the same timeframe—eliminating sector strength as an explanatory variable and isolating individual stock behaviour as the determining factor.
Educational Takeaway:The temptation to trade laggards often stems from believing "this one hasn't moved yet, it's just going to follow the leader." Historical pattern analysis suggests this approach generates inferior outcomes. Laggards demonstrate weakness for structural reasons—overhead supply, lack of institutional sponsorship, or fundamental concerns—that prevent them from matching leader performance even when sector conditions favour the group.
Lesson 2: How to Identify Leaders—The Top 3-4 Rule
Systematic leader identification requires establishing criteria that differentiate accumulation patterns from distribution patterns. Gary Glover's methodology emphasises focusing exclusively on the top-performing stocks within each sector rather than attempting to trade the entire sector universe.
The Top 3-4 Names Principle
Educational framework: "You want to be with the leader and you want to be with probably number two and number three. And then once you start looking wider than that down the list, I think you're opening yourself there."
This principle suggests limiting focus to the three or four strongest names within each sector showing leadership characteristics. Trading beyond this subset introduces additional risk as stocks further down the performance rankings often demonstrate the laggard characteristics discussed in Lesson 1. This approach aligns with Mark Minervini's sector strength methodology for isolating high-probability setups.
Leader Identification Checklist
Educational literature describes several observable characteristics that distinguish leaders from laggards:
Swing Low Pattern:Leaders make higher swing lows during sector corrections. Each successive pullback finds support at a level higher than the previous low, creating an ascending pattern of support levels that indicates accumulation.
Volume Characteristics:Leaders show diminishing volume during pullbacks and expanding volume during advances. This pattern indicates supply exhaustion during corrections (sellers reducing activity) and increasing demand during rallies (buyers becoming more aggressive).
Moving Average Behaviour:Leaders hold the 50-day moving average as support during corrections. Price action may briefly undercut this average but quickly recovers, demonstrating institutional support at this technical level.
Relative Strength During Weakness:Leaders decline less than sector peers during market weakness and advance more during sector strength. This relative performance indicates concentrated institutional interest in specific names within the sector.
Breakout Follow-Through:Leaders break prior swing highs within one to three sessions after consolidation periods. Laggards often consolidate, attempt breakouts, then fail to hold new highs—creating false breakout patterns that trap traders.
Insurance Sector Emergence: IAG, QBE, SUN
The insurance sector provided real-time demonstration of leader emergence during the observation period. Insurance Australia Group (IAG), QBE Insurance Group (QBE), and Suncorp Group (SUN) all broke from consolidation patterns with substantial volume increases within the same week.
Observable Characteristics:All three insurance stocks demonstrated the leader checklist criteria simultaneously:
Broke from multi-week consolidation patterns
Volume surged significantly above average on breakout days
Price action held above 50-day moving averages post-breakout
Created higher swing lows during brief intraday pullbacks
Sector-Wide Leadership:When multiple stocks within a sector demonstrate leadership characteristics simultaneously, this suggests thematic strength rather than isolated stock-specific factors. The insurance sector emergence represented sector rotation—capital flowing from one industry group to another as market participants reassessed relative value. Educational frameworks for identifying these emerging opportunities before broad market recognition include systematic approaches like the Launch Pad methodology for finding emerging thematic opportunities.
Educational Application:Rather than attempting to identify the single best insurance stock, educational frameworks suggest equal consideration of all three leaders (IAG, QBE, SUN) that demonstrated systematic breakout characteristics. Diversifying across multiple sector leaders reduces single-stock risk while maintaining sector exposure.
Lesson 3: Moving Average Behaviour in Leaders
Moving averages provide dynamic support and resistance levels that reveal institutional behaviour. Leaders demonstrate consistent respect for specific moving averages, while laggards show erratic behaviour relative to these technical levels.
AII (Almonly Industries): The 10-Day Moving Average Tendency
Almonly Industries (AII) demonstrated textbook moving average behaviour during its advance. The stock made multiple swing highs while consistently holding the 10-day moving average as support throughout the trending period.
Glover's educational observation: "This stock just doesn't fail to amaze me each week... that's just a really nice trend. It just kind of reminds me of Spartan—going up pretty strongly, healthy volumes, and then pull back on and just no selling here."
Observable Characteristics:
Consistent Support:AII pulled back to the 10-day moving average multiple times during its advance. Each pullback found support at or slightly above this average, then resumed the uptrend. This pattern indicates systematic buying interest at this technical level.
Volume Contraction on Pullbacks:During corrections to the 10-day moving average, volume diminished substantially. Down days showed minimal selling pressure—suggesting existing holders maintained positions while short-term traders exited, creating temporary pullbacks without triggering institutional distribution.
Impulsive Advances, Corrective Sideways Movement:The price pattern alternated between sharp advances (impulsive moves) and sideways consolidations (corrective moves). This rhythm—up impulsively, sideways correctively—characterises healthy trending stocks where profit-taking occurs without triggering reversal.
Moving Average Crossovers:The stock periodically crossed below the 10-day moving average briefly before recovering. Educational frameworks note that leaders can violate moving averages temporarily without invalidating the trend, provided recovery occurs quickly and volume contracts during the violation.
LYC (Lynas Rare Earths): Overlapping B-Wave Patterns
Lynas Rare Earths (LYC) demonstrated more complex moving average behaviour, illustrating that leaders don't always follow textbook patterns. The stock experienced a substantial pullback that stayed in the top half of the prior advance, then built multiple overlapping B-wave break attempts.
The Overlapping Pattern:Glover describes the phenomenon: "We're getting a few overlapping B-wave breaks lately that have popped up and then come back to the 20, then maybe popped up again and then come back again."
This pattern differs from clean breakouts where price breaks above the B-wave peak and continues advancing. Instead, overlapping patterns show:
Initial B-wave break attempt
Pullback to 20-day moving average
Second B-wave break attempt
Another pullback to 20-day moving average
Eventually sustained breakout or failure
Educational Framework:Educational literature on pattern recognition suggests overlapping patterns require increased patience. The stock tests breakout levels multiple times before either committing to continuation or rolling over into distribution. During these patterns, the 20-day moving average acts as the critical support level—holding this average keeps the setup valid, while breaking below invalidates the pattern.
Prior Swing High Support:During LYC's pullback, the stock held above the prior swing high from January during the March correction. This level represented previous resistance that, once broken, should theoretically provide support on future pullbacks. The stock holding this level suggested the advance remained structurally intact despite the overlapping pattern complexity.
TNE (Technology One): Reliable 10-Day Moving Average Adherence
Technology One (TNE) demonstrated the most reliable moving average behaviour among the examples studied. The stock consistently held the 10-day moving average through multiple trend legs, creating a systematic support level for position management.
Historical Consistency:Glover's analysis of TNE's historical price action revealed consistent 10-day moving average behaviour across multiple trending periods: "Go back and look at the last move there... it held the 10 all the way through. And even the prior moves as well... it held the 10 until it had a pause."
The Classic Retest:TNE demonstrated what educational frameworks describe as the "classic retest of the moving average"—breaking above the B-wave peak, pulling back to test the 10-day or 20-day moving average, then resuming the advance. This retest provides a potential entry point for traders who missed the initial breakout.
Position Management Application:For stocks demonstrating reliable moving average behaviour, some methodologies suggest using the average as a trailing stop level. If TNE closes below the 10-day moving average on volume, this signals potential loss of momentum and transition to corrective behaviour.
Lesson 4: Rookie Trader Traps—Overhead Supply
Stocks declining from significant highs create overhead supply—previous buyers who purchased at higher prices and now represent potential sellers waiting to exit at breakeven or minimal loss. This overhead supply acts as resistance that impedes price advances even when broader market conditions improve.
FND and LKY: Classic Overhead Supply Patterns
Findi Limited (FND) and Lykke Corp (LKY) both demonstrated classic overhead supply characteristics. Both stocks declined substantially from prior highs, then showed volume increases at lower price levels that might superficially suggest accumulation.
Educational observation from Glover: "In the old days, starting to look interesting, but they're still laggards there... like seeing the sort of price action down the lows there, but I just know that's notorious for younger rookie traders trying to trade those things."
What Makes These Patterns Deceptive:
Volume at Lower Levels:Both stocks showed increased volume after substantial declines. This volume might appear to indicate accumulation—new buyers establishing positions at lower prices. However, volume characteristics alone don't distinguish accumulation from distribution. Without additional confirmation (higher swing lows, moving average support), increased volume simply indicates activity without directional bias.
Still Below 50-Day Moving Average:Both FND and LKY remained below the 50-day moving average during the observation period. This indicates the stocks haven't demonstrated sufficient strength to reclaim this basic technical level. Leaders typically trade above the 50-day moving average and use it as support; laggards trade below it and encounter resistance at this level.
Massive Downtrend Context:The broader context shows both stocks in substantial downtrends extending over multiple months. Short-term volume spikes or brief price bounces don't invalidate the larger pattern of distribution and declining highs.
The Overhead Supply Mechanism
When stocks decline 40-60% from highs, they create zones of concentrated overhead supply at various price levels. Previous buyers at higher prices represent potential sellers who may exit positions when price rallies back toward their entry levels.
Educational framework describes this as "a lot of sellers in the way, a lot of losers in the way" creating resistance zones. As price attempts to rally through these zones, supply increases as underwater holders exit, capping advances and preventing sustained breakouts.
What Genuine Accumulation Requires
Educational literature on accumulation patterns suggests two forms of strength required before considering stocks emerging from substantial declines:
Form 1: Explosive Volume BreakoutA single-session or multi-session explosive advance on substantially increased volume that gaps through overhead supply zones rather than grinding through them. This violent move exhausts sellers quickly and establishes new support levels above previous resistance.
Form 2: Extended Sideways ConsolidationAn extended period (many months) of sideways price action while the broader market declines. This relative strength—not declining while peers decline—demonstrates accumulation occurring without price appreciation. Eventually this consolidation leads to breakout when market conditions improve.
FND and LKY demonstrated neither form. They bounced modestly from lows without explosive volume and without extended sideways consolidation showing relative strength.
"If I Can Save You a Few Years"
Glover's educational guidance: "If I can save you a few years of harm, just keep away from those. Look for the stronger names. Look for that sign of strength there."
This experiential observation suggests traders often spend years attempting to profit from oversold stocks with overhead supply before learning that leader-focused strategies generate superior risk-adjusted returns. The opportunity cost—missing genuine leaders while capital sits in laggards—compounds the direct losses from failed laggard trades.
Lesson 5: Position Management—The David Ryan Scaling Framework
Position management determines whether traders capture extended moves or exit prematurely. Educational frameworks from professional traders suggest systematic scaling approaches rather than binary "all in, all out" position management. For detailed analysis of entry timing, position sizing calculations, and exit strategies within systematic frameworks, see VCP Trade Execution on ASX: Minervini's Entry, Position Sizing & Exit Strategies.
YAL (Yancoal Australia): The Extended Position Challenge
Yancoal Australia (YAL) advanced substantially, creating the challenge of managing extended positions. When stocks rally far from entry points and moving averages, traders face the question: take profits on extended gains or hold for potential continuation?
Educational observation: "We're getting pretty far away from that 50-day moving average right now... the 10-day moving average is back at 680, that's a dollar away. So that's 15% away."
The Extension Problem:When stocks extend 15-20% beyond their moving averages, they become vulnerable to sharp pullbacks even if the underlying trend remains intact. However, exiting entirely risks missing additional gains if the stock continues advancing before correcting.
David Ryan's Scaling Methodology
David Ryan's approach, as described in educational trading literature, involves systematic partial exits at multiples of initial risk while holding a core position with a moving average trailing stop.
The Multiple-Based Exit Framework:
Educational framework used by some professional traders:
3R Exit: When unrealized gain reaches three times initial risk, exit 30-50% of position
5R Exit: At five times initial risk, exit additional 25-30% of position
9R Exit: At nine times initial risk, consider additional scaling
11R Exit: At eleven times initial risk, final scaling decision
Final Position: Hold remaining position with 10-day or 20-day moving average trailing stop
Example Calculation:If initial risk (entry to stop-loss) equals $1,000:
3R = $3,000 unrealized gain → exit 30-50%
5R = $5,000 unrealized gain → exit 25-30%
9R = $9,000 unrealized gain → potential exit
11R = $11,000 unrealized gain → final scaling
Mathematical Outcome:Scaling at 11R locks in approximately 6R profit (averaging early exits with later exits). This 6R gain covers the next six losing trades assuming standard 1R loss on failed setups—providing statistical edge even with 50% win rate.
Gary Glover's Evolution: From 3-for-1 to Multi-Stage Scaling
Glover describes his methodological evolution: "I used to be three for one, Chris, years ago. I would take everything off for three times my risk. So fact that I've now got myself to six times risk across the board there, that's a big shift for me personally."
This evolution—from exiting entirely at 3R to now averaging 6R through scaling—demonstrates adaptation toward capturing larger moves while still protecting capital through systematic partial exits. This approach shares philosophical alignment with Mark Minervini's SEPA methodology, which emphasises specific entry points and systematic position management.
The Mental Health Dimension
Educational literature describes psychological benefits of scaling beyond pure mathematics. Glover articulates this: "It's almost like a mental health sort of self-risk as well... take a little bit off then you're still long some. So you still if it keeps going higher then as a trader you cope with that. And if it pulls back, oh, at least I took some off."
Psychological Framework:
Scenario 1: Stock Continues HigherIf the stock advances substantially after partial exit, the trader still holds position and captures additional gains. This reduces regret from "selling too early" because remaining position participates in continuation.
Scenario 2: Stock ReversesIf the stock reverses after partial exit, the trader has locked in profits on the exited portion. This reduces regret from "giving back gains" because partial exit secured some profit regardless of reversal.
Both Scenarios:The scaling framework reduces emotional extremes by ensuring partial success regardless of outcome. This emotional management supports consistent execution of the methodology across multiple trades.
Kristjan Kullamaggie: The Drawdown Reality
Educational context from professional momentum trader Kristjan Kullamaggie: "50 to 60% of the year he's in drawdown."
This statistic—a world-class momentum trader spending majority of the year in drawdown—provides reality check for expectation management. Even optimal methodologies experience extended periods of capital below peak levels. The edge comes from occasional large gains (100-300% moves) that offset frequent smaller losses and neutral periods.
Methodological Difference:Kullamaggie's approach involves more aggressive position sizing and holding for larger multiples (targeting 100-300% gains) compared to more conservative approaches that exit earlier. This aggressive style generates higher returns when successful but requires tolerance for larger drawdowns and longer periods underwater between successful trades.
Lesson 6: Emerging Leaders Before Sector Rotation
The most profitable opportunities often occur when identifying emerging leaders before broad market recognition. These setups appear during market weakness when most stocks decline, making the relative strength of emerging leaders more apparent through contrast. Understanding vertical trends and sector rotation patterns provides context for when these transitions typically occur.
TNE (Technology One): 0123 Bottom vs Accumulation Cylinder
Technology One (TNE) demonstrated emerging leadership characteristics through its consolidation structure. The stock formed what some methodologies describe as a "0123 bottom"—a four-point reversal pattern marking transition from downtrend to uptrend.
Pattern Structure:
Educational frameworks describe the 0123 bottom as:
Point 0: The low point of the decline
Point 1: First rally off the low
Point 2: Pullback that holds above Point 0 (higher low)
Point 3: Rally that exceeds Point 1 high
This structure creates ascending swing lows and highs, indicating transition from distribution to accumulation.
Accumulation Cylinder Alternative:
However, Glover notes TNE's pattern appeared "a little steep" compared to his preferred "accumulation cylinder" setup. The accumulation cylinder pattern, referenced in Stan Weinstein's educational work, involves more horizontal consolidation where price oscillates in a range rather than ascending at a steep angle.
Educational observation: "I prefer to sort of see that sort of setup... that's sort of more cylinder sort of setup because... to go back and look at those Stan Weinstein sort of patterns as well, they had that sort of 0123 and then they explode out of them there."
Why Pattern Shape Matters:
Steeper ascending patterns (like TNE) can work but carry higher risk of failure if momentum doesn't continue. The accumulation cylinder—where stock consolidates horizontally for extended period—allows more time for accumulation and overhead supply absorption before breakout.
TNE's Saving Grace:
Despite less-than-ideal pattern steepness, TNE demonstrated the critical moving average behaviour discussed in Lesson 3. The stock held the 10-day moving average consistently through its advance, indicating genuine institutional support despite pattern imperfection.
DTR (Dateline Resources): Second-Leg VCP Setup
Dateline Resources (DTR) illustrated second-leg opportunity recognition—identifying stocks that made initial advances, corrected, then set up for potential second advances.
First-Leg Advance:DTR experienced substantial advance (the "massive run" creating the first leg). This initial move established the stock as capable of attracting institutional interest and demonstrating price momentum.
Consolidation Period:Following the advance, DTR corrected and consolidated for multiple months. Educational framework suggests: "They will pull back there... this contraction can be three, five, out sort of seven months is sort of where most of them sort of sit before they have the next leg."
This timeframe—three to seven months of consolidation after initial advance—represents typical digestion period before second-leg opportunities develop.
VCP Characteristics:
The consolidation showed characteristics educational literature associates with Volatility Contraction Patterns (VCPs):
Multiple contraction phases of decreasing magnitude (October-November, late January-February, February-March)
Diminishing volatility through successive consolidations
Volume contraction during pullbacks
Stock holding above 50% retracement of prior advance
For comprehensive analysis of VCP pattern identification and validation criteria, see the Complete VCP Trading Guide for ASX Markets.
B-Wave Break Setup:
The pattern formed smaller B-wave corrections within the larger consolidation. Educational methodology suggests entering when price breaks above the B-wave peak on expanding volume, confirming the ABC correction has completed.
Sector Diversification Context:
DTR's dual sector exposure (gold and rare earths, according to discussion) provides natural diversification. If one sector cools while the other strengthens, the stock maintains sponsorship from at least one institutional constituency.
Volume Validation:
Critical to DTR's setup: "There's some good volume there. And what I love was that that little three or four days down, I didn't see much selling coming." Volume expansion on advances combined with volume contraction on pullbacks confirms accumulation pattern rather than distribution.
Practical Application Framework
Systematic identification of ASX momentum leaders requires integration of all six lessons into cohesive methodology:
Step 1: Sector IdentificationMonitor which sectors show emerging relative strength through Launch Pad methodology or similar systematic sector rotation frameworks. Focus analysis on sectors demonstrating multiple stocks with leadership characteristics rather than isolated individual stock strength.
Step 2: Leader IsolationWithin identified sectors, apply the Top 3-4 Rule. Rank stocks by relative strength and focus exclusively on the three to four strongest names showing higher swing lows, volume accumulation patterns, and moving average support.
Step 3: Pattern ConfirmationVerify identified leaders demonstrate specific technical patterns: 0123 bottoms, accumulation cylinders, VCP characteristics, or B-wave break setups. Patterns should show diminishing volatility and volume contraction during consolidation phases.
Step 4: Overhead Supply AssessmentReject stocks showing FND/LKY characteristics regardless of sector strength. Avoid stocks in extended downtrends, trading below 50-day moving averages, or carrying substantial overhead supply from prior highs.
Step 5: Moving Average ValidationConfirm stock demonstrates respect for key moving averages (10-day, 20-day, or 50-day). Leaders show consistent support at these levels during corrections, while laggards show erratic behaviour or use averages as resistance.
Step 6: Position Management PlanningBefore entry, establish scaling plan using multiple-based exits (3R, 5R, 9R, 11R) or alternative systematic approach. Define final position size to hold with moving average trailing stop.
Educational Disclaimer
This content provides educational analysis of systematic methodologies for identifying momentum leaders on ASX. The frameworks discussed represent analysis of historical price patterns and do not constitute financial advice, recommendations, or solicitation to buy, sell, or hold any securities.
Company Examples: All stock examples (BPT, BOE, PDN, DYL, BMN, IAG, QBE, SUN, AII, LYC, TNE, FND, LKY, YAL, DTR) reference historical price action during specific observation periods for educational pattern illustration only. These examples do not constitute recommendations for current or future action. These securities may no longer display these patterns, may have materially different fundamentals, or may no longer be suitable for the strategies discussed.
Individual Results: Gary Glover's trading experiences and methodologies represent individual approaches based on his specific experience, capital, and risk tolerance. These methodologies are presented for educational purposes and should not be interpreted as recommendations for individual application.
Risk of Loss: All trading and investment involves substantial risk of loss, including total loss of capital. The scaling methodologies, pattern recognition frameworks, and sector rotation approaches discussed require adaptation to individual circumstances, risk tolerance, and financial objectives.
Expert Attribution: References to David Ryan, Kristjan Kullamaggie, and Stan Weinstein cite educational concepts from published trading literature and public interviews. These attributions serve educational purposes and do not constitute endorsements.
No Advice: This content does not consider individual financial situations, objectives, needs, or risk tolerance. Readers must conduct independent research and consult licensed financial advisers before making investment decisions appropriate to their personal circumstances.
Educational Disclaimer
This content is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
The information, opinions and other materials appearing on the Web Site are of a general nature only and shall not be construed as advice. Finer Market Points Pty Ltd, CAR 1304002, AFSL 526688, ABN 87 645 284 680. This general information is educational only and not financial advice, recommendation, forecast or solicitation. Rose Bay Equities accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the information, opinions or other materials provided on or accessible through the Web Site. The Web Site has not been prepared with reference to your individual financial or personal circumstances. You should not rely on any advice in this Web Site without first seeking appropriate professional, financial and legal advice. Further, where Rose Bay Equities makes third party material available or accessible through the Web Site you acknowledge that Rose Bay Equities is a distributor and not a publisher of that content and that its editorial control is limited to the selection of those materials to make available. We accept no liability for any loss or damages arising from use.
Comments